Versión en español: https://acform.es/bot

LisvaroApp: the Lisvaro crawler

Lisvaro is a mobile app that watches the price of the products each user adds by hand, and alerts them when it drops. This page explains exactly what our agent does when it requests a page from your site, and how to exclude it if you would rather it did not.

Current status: the app has not been released yet.

Lisvaro is still in development and has not been distributed through any app store. The only legitimate traffic with this agent today comes from two test phones.

If you are seeing requests identifying themselves as LisvaroApp that do not match what this page describes, they either come from our own testing, or someone is using our name without being us: either way we want to know. Write to info [at] acform.es with a sample of your logs.

In short: we download only the addresses a user has pasted by hand, in order to read the price. We do not crawl, do not follow links and do not look for new content. Every request is made by that user's phone, not by a server of ours. To exclude yourself, use the robots.txt rule below, or write to info [at] acform.es and we will apply it on our side.

Identification

Normal requests identify themselves like this:

LisvaroApp/1.0 (+https://acform.es/bot)

Until August 2026 this application was called Precio and identified itself as PrecioApp. Nobody uses that name any more. If you have it in a robots.txt rule, read How to exclude us: it needs changing.

Some product pages do not publish the price in the HTML: their JavaScript paints it after loading. For those — and only those, after trying the normal path first — the app opens the page in the phone's own browser (the system WebView), which identifies itself with its usual User-Agent, the same one you would see if that person opened your site by hand. We do not falsify that string in either direction: we do not put ours on a real browser, and we do not put a browser's on our client.

The robots.txt is always requested as LisvaroApp, including when the page is going to be loaded by the browser. That way the exclusion described below works in every case.

And when we load your page in that browser, we block image downloads, always and without exception: we only care about the price. On an Amazon product page that brings the load down from 4,290 kB to 1,140 kB measured. It saves you bandwidth and saves the user data.

What it does

Every request comes from the connection of a specific user's phone that asked to watch that product. There is no server of ours requesting your pages.

What it does not do

Data

Everything is stored on the user's phone. There are no central servers, no profiles and no collection of browsing data. We cannot see what anyone is watching. There is no centralised copy of your store's prices: we do not share it, publish it or sell it, because we do not have it.

Why the traffic comes from many different IPs

Lisvaro is not a centralised crawler. Each request is made by the phone of a specific user who asked to watch that product, from their own connection.

The practical consequence is worth knowing: requests arrive from many different residential IPs and there is no range you can block. The only stable thing is the User-Agent string. That is why we always identify ourselves the same way, and why this page exists: it is the only way for you to say "no" and to verify that we comply.

In terms of volume, each user only checks the products they have saved, and each of those at most once every half hour.

On impersonation

Anyone can write LisvaroApp in their own User-Agent. We cannot prove by IP that a request is ours, because they do not come from any infrastructure of ours, and we are not going to pretend otherwise.

If you see traffic identifying itself as LisvaroApp whose behaviour does not match what is described here — high volume, link traversal, bursts, attempts to reach private areas — write to us with a sample of your logs. We want to know, and we will help you characterise it.

How to exclude us

If you had already excluded us under the old name, that rule no longer works. Until August 2026 this application was called Precio and its agent was PrecioApp. It is now called Lisvaro and the token is LisvaroApp.

And it does not fail visibly: it fails silently. robots.txt tokens are matched as a prefix of the agent's name, and PrecioApp is not a prefix of LisvaroApp, so a rule written with the old name does not exclude us and nothing tells you so. We are saying it here because it is the only thing that lets you notice.

Change the token in your rule to the one below. And if you want to be certain in the meantime, write to us: exclusion by email is applied on our side and does not depend on any file.

With robots.txt — active and working

This is the recommended method and we obey it:

User-agent: LisvaroApp
Disallow: /

We also honour partial rules (Disallow: /private/), Allow directives, and Crawl-delay when it is stricter than our minimum interval. We fetch the file before the first read of each origin and cache it for 24 hours.

One important detail if you use a CDN or a web application firewall. If your server answers 403 or 401 to the robots.txt itself, there are no rules to read, and we follow RFC 9309 §2.3.1.3: that is interpreted as no published restrictions. It is what any standard-respecting agent does.

If you want to exclude us, your robots.txt has to be reachable and contain the rule above. If your CDN blocks it for unknown agents, the exclusion will never be read.

If your server returns a 5xx error for the robots.txt, we do not fetch the page: we would rather wait than assume permission when the file might exist.

By email

Write to info [at] acform.es stating the domain. It is also the channel for any question, complaint or request about the agent's behaviour: we answer.

You do not need to justify or explain the request. The only thing we need to check is that the domain is yours: write from an address at that domain, or from the contact published on it. It is not a hurdle to put you off and we will not argue about your reasons; it is the only thing stopping someone from excluding a site that is not theirs.

You can choose how far we go

Tell us which of the three you prefer. If you do not say, we apply the second one:

With "manual only" you stop receiving every automated request of ours. We spell this out because it is the usual question when choosing: from then on, the only thing that can reach you from the app is a person tapping a link to open your site in their browser, and that is an ordinary visit — not our agent, not identified as LisvaroApp, and not governed by any robots.txt. Full exclusion does not save you a single further request: what it does is stop the product from being saved at all.

The robots.txt rule above is equivalent to "manual only": we stop requesting the page, and what a user then does with their own browser is not governed by that file.

Contact

info [at] acform.es